Poverty in Zambia: Assessing the Impacts of Trade Liberalisation in the 1990s1

نویسندگان

  • Julie Litchfield
  • Neil McCulloch
چکیده

Zambia is one of the poorest countries in sub-Saharan Africa and there is evidence that suggests that living standards worsened during part of the 1990s. There is evidence, using national poverty lines, that poverty increased between 1991 and 1996 by 20% among the those below a food-only poverty line and by 16% among those below a general poverty line (McCulloch et al, 2001). In 1996 an estimated 73% of the population lived on less than a dollar a day (World Bank 2000). Between 1996 and 1998, the last year for which comparable household survey is available, there have been reductions in poverty, although not sufficient to offset the rise between 1991 and 1996. The increase in poverty between 1991 and 1996 occurred during a period of fairly extensive economic reforms, including a stabilisation programme, reforms of agricultural marketing, privatisation, trade liberalisation and public sector reform. Given this, it is not implausible that the rise in poverty was caused by one or more of these policies, singly or in combination. Equally likely though is that not everyone will have been affected in the same way, that there will have been winners and losers from the reforms. The aim of this background paper is to summarise some of the key features of the changes in poverty between 1991 and 1998, disaggregating the findings by geographical location and other socio-economic categories. The paper will also summarise some of the essential features of the reforms in the 1990s and set out a number of alternative approaches for analysing the impacts of these reforms on poverty. Some preliminary results are then presented to motivate discussion.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Untangling links between trade, poverty and gender - ODI Briefing Papers 38

• Changes in employment, prices and social expenditures are three pathways linking trade and gender • Trade liberalisation may have positive or negative impacts, but there are risks for women • Trade reforms must be complemented by social and labour policies to ensure that women can take full advantage of the new economic environment L inks between trade, growth and poverty reduction are under ...

متن کامل

Agriculture Trade Openness and Poverty Reduction: A Cross-Country Analysis

This paper explores the effects of general and agricultural trade openness on economic freedom and alongside with the quality of institutions, on income and poverty. Recent cross-country data for over 200 nations in global regions were used to estimate equations for income, poverty and economic freedom. Economic freedom appears to have positive impacts on income levels, which together with good...

متن کامل

The Fragility of the Evidence on Inequality, Trade Liberalisation, Growth and Poverty

There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the relationships between income inequality and growth, trade policy and growth, and growth and poverty. We contribute to this literature by exploring the relationships between inequality, trade liberalisation, growth and poverty in a sample of exclusively developing countries. We find moderately robust evidence for a negative effect of inequali...

متن کامل

Assessing biodiversity impacts of trade: a review of challenges in the agriculture sector

Agricultural expansion is a major driver for loss of biodiversity; changes in land use or intensity associated with trade liberalisation can therefore have major consequences. Assessments of the impacts of agricultural trade have tended to neglect biodiversity, despite its crucial role in maintaining productive agro-ecosystems. Advice on assessment of biodiversity impacts is required to support...

متن کامل

The Economic Partnership Agreement between Uganda and the EU: Trade and Poverty Impacts

This paper analyses the poverty impacts of an economic partnership agreement (EPA) between Uganda and the EU. As Ugandan exports are also eligible for dutyfree access to the EU under the Everything But Arms scheme the main EPAinduced change will be the requirement to liberalise EU exporters' access to the Ugandan market. Fears have been raised that this could threaten the livelihoods of poor pe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003